Oct. 19th, 2006

kokopelle: Horse Totem (Angry)
3rd Degree - Being

My advice to anyone considering being 3rd degree is to consider long and hard what their tradition's requirements are for this level. Generally, as a third degree, a person no longer considered a student of the tradition. They can no longer defer problems to their teachers or ask their teachers to protect them. At 3rd degree the full responsibility of the tradition is laid across the shoulders of those who initiate into this level. The task of the continued existence of the tradition is given to the 3rd degree. There are new teachings that are given at this level. The teachings are powerful, and have to be as they are the tools for continuing the path for those who will follow.

The initiatory trials at this level can be very harsh. Since this is a degree of living the tradition, the person is tested to see if they have fully incorporated all of the tools that the tradition avails them. This is especially true in older shamanic traditions. While there may not be the rigid three-tier initiation process, the final shamanic initiation is a do-or-die trial. The tribe depends on the Shaman for their existence, so the to-be Shaman must prove they have the tools to survive the initiation as a precursor to helping the tribe survive. While death is not a component of modern 3rd degree initiations, the person is tested sufficiently to see if they have what it takes to become the caretaker of a tradition and of a people.

There is a shadow side to the 3rd degree. The 3rd degree person has the power to promote others through the lower degrees or all the way to 3rd degree. This responsibility can be abused, and those who are not prepared for the positions can be promoted ahead of their time, if indeed they should be promoted at all. Many traditions pay attention to a person's lineage. Lineage is the measure of who initiated a person, who initiated their teacher, and so on. Lineage is a test of the seriousness and strength of a person's mystical creation. Some lineages are respected and others are considered to be insufficient to the over-all tradition's guidelines. All suffer when a person is initiated improperly. The person is asked to take on duties with insufficient training and methods. The tradition suffers because the original intent is warped and damaged. Future students suffer as their degrees are not respected by the overall community. Aside from reputations damaged, there can be a danger to life or psyche when forces are manipulated without adequate training and safeguards. It is incumbent upon the teachers to properly pick their students. It is also very important for a student to know something about the teacher, and the student should walk away if there are questions about legitimacy of the teacher or their methods.

As now a Reiki Master, the 3rd degree position, I have the power and the responsibility to induct new people as Reiki healers. This position carries the responsibility of maintaining the goals of my tradition and insuring it will continue with the right teachings and people in place. I am not teaching Reiki now. This is not acceptable in the long-run. The position I have asks for me to both safeguard and spread the healing technique, and my induction as a Reiki Master holds me to this.

I hope this article has shed light onto the traditional methods of a three degree system. Again, as I am not Neopagan, I do not have insider information on the methods used in that path. Indeed, if I did, I could not share them here as they are safeguarded with vows of secrecy. All I know has been observed in passing or has been picked up via my own studies. More intimately, I have shared information on my own Reiki pathworking. I do feel the sum of the information is sufficient to advise and warn the prospective student to the trials that lay ahead. Taking on the mantle of any tradition is a serious task and should not be taken lightly. There are great rewards of knowledge, self-awareness, transformation, membership in a community, and service to others. In the end all good paths lead to service, and this is where the student is heading as they leave the pack of Cowan and begin their own pathworking journey.
kokopelle: Horse Totem (Dangerous)
Whew... at least I statistically exist. I put my gf's name in, finding there were zero (0) occurrences of her existence. Do I date a ghost? An ephemeral specter? Ack!


HowManyOfMe.com
LogoThere are:
546
people with my name
in the U.S.A.

How many have your name?

kokopelle: Horse Totem (On-Target)
I was listening to Fresh Air on NPR this morning. A segment featured the former deputy director of a government initiative. He has just published a book outlining his disagreements and desires for changed based on his two year (I think) stay in the government agency. The former deputy director was sincere, walking the line between compassionate anger and being a voice for change. He really took to task the political guys above the agency, saying that they only gave lip service to the goal of the agency.

The rebuttal to the former deputy director came from his former boss. Ouch! She had stayed with the initiative, leaving just this year after four years of service. While I did find her sincere enough, when she wasn't spinning like a top, I took issue with some of the arguments she had. She basically said:

1) The guy was happy when he left, so why is he writing a disgruntled tell-all book now?

Is this suppose to imply that the former deputy director has been corrupted or just isn't stable? I see this as a real cheap shot, as there are people who "put up" with their jobs, even to the point of mouthing nice things about the place. And, in the former director's defense, he had nothing but praise for his co-workers. He instead took issue with the political oversight, those who get the money, above his group.

2) Though it took time, the initiatives that the deputy director was speaking of did finally get funding approval. This happened after he left.

This is a weak argument. Did the initiatives get full funding approval, to the amount that the top executive promised? Probably not.

3) There was full support from political guys. Everyone was on board. Maybe the deputy director only saw the reactions from the intern-flunkies, because goodness knows everyone else was fully committed. Besides, the deputy director didn't know the "full picture". His comments are questionable because he was really a marginal player. AND, the former deputy director didn't name-names, so who knows who he was talking about?

LOL... this is the most insulting of all the arguments. The former deputy director's experience was his own. He knew what he saw. He didn't name-names of all the players because that would truly be career/political suicide. He did name the top guy as being two-faced, and boy is that already getting the former deputy director some heat.

The whole thing came off looking like a long-knives smearing attempt. The big-guys are really pissed. The former boss was pulled in to do damage control. This just makes me feel all warm-n-fuzzy about human nature (NOT).

April 2020

S M T W T F S
   1 23 4
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 12th, 2026 05:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios